Durham Watch

Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns. Special Counsel John H. Durham's final two - part report for permit public dissemination. Read More.

Everything you need to know about the trial being run by special counsel John Durham Read More.

Special Counsel John H. Durham, submits this brief pursuant to the Court’s Trial Order to state its objections to the following instructions proposed by the Defendant. Read More.

Igor Danchenko submits the following argument regarding disputed jury instructions Read More.

The government has filed an omnibus Motion in Limine [Doc. No. 78] (the “Motion”), seeking to admit (1) three instances of uncharged conduct by Defendant Igor Y. Danchenko Read More.

Defendant Igor Danchenko, by and through counsel, respectfully submits this Motion in Limine to preclude evidence, testimony, or argument that Charles Dolan jokingly and baselessly speculated that Igor Danchenko may have been associated with the Russian government. Read More.

Defendant Igor Danchenko requests that the Court exclude the Special Counsel from presenting certain irrelevant, unduly prejudicial, misleading, and confusing evidence Read More.

Defendant Igor Danchenko, by and through counsel, moves in limine to admit statements the Government made in publicly available guidance and training material posted on official Government websites to advise witnesses about how to testify and answer questions. Read More.

Several prospective jurors are excused for cause in the USA v. Danchenko case. Read More.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Igor Danchenko’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment for Failure to State an Offense [Doc. No. 79] (the “Motion”). Read More.

The Court indicated that the parties would be notified on the jurors stricken for cause based on the questionnaire. Read More.

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, Special Counsel John H. Durham, respectfully submits this reply to the defendant’s Opposition to the Government’s Motions In Limine. Read More.

In this phase of the United States of America v. Igor Danchenko case, a request for authorization to bring electronic device(s) into the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was made. Read More.

Defendant Igor Danchenko’s replies in support of motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to state an offense Read More.

Noah Cherry appears in this case as counsel for the defendant Igor Y. Danchenko. Read More.